The previous attempt was made considering the issues that affect us all. We live in a twenty-first century, and probably nobody would want to opt out of the facility, which provides technical progress. Hardly anyone chooses to leave, even when the lack of lighting, hot water, etc. Nevertheless, oceńmy ourselves how little we are interested in these issues? For most of us have the power plugged in, the heat from the radiator, the energy to prepare food from the kitchen. One would think such a change in the anecdotes, "milk from the store, not from the barn."
so-called opinion-making centers, time and again publicize events related to the issues raised here . This is done "professionally" and that to the extent that those who are not from the industry that "on tree! Bored professional jargon we omit articles, broadcasts, and forgetting - and here trifle - a wealthy finance institutions making up the sector of National Economy.
make daily payments of excise taxes, whether in grocery and industrial products, whether in direct accounts, electricity, fuel and many others. Someone has to pay to the economy is "revolved." It turns out that these fees are a huge part of our income. Going to the store, we pay for goods that we want to buy and often we have a lot of comments about the quality, price and same service in the store. Silent, however, and skip the most expensive case in our spending, limiting, for example, to complain about the prices resulting from the accounts as "current".
Instead, we hear or read about the big contribution of grants and projects in these topics from the energy sector. Think about who and what makes the financial support levels, and where does the money? You can write a powerful elaboraty answer is very simple: the above mentioned taxes! Donors, stating in a nutshell, they are various government organizations, concentrated in the municipalities, provinces or the central level. Come to the EU funds, which like the national measures BUDGET come from our country and the Member States. The budget is the result of our tax payments made to the Inland Revenue and not just the so-called. our annual tax returns, or returns an advance income tax. Purchasing the good in them pay taxes on goods and services producers. This happens throughout the EU, with which we are affiliated with you. So we have a simple answer, which allow us understand that sometimes you may want to know more, where does the money generated by us.
In every country, regardless of its wealth, the budget is always less than the needs posed to him in a given society. Expenditure on health, education, defense, environmental protection, human rights, social affairs, etc., are financed from the budget. For the distribution of insufficient resources, had been made in the most appropriate way, realizing the most important needs, the concept of lobbying. The rules of lobbying, or persuade the authorities to allocate budget amounts for specific purposes, have been normalized law of the country. Such institutions acting within the sector, are intended to persuade and thereby raise as much money.
The current in the previous considerations the energy sector, because of the question here, in addition to needs related to the ongoing technological progress, is also required for the implementation of "global warming". Investments of this type are very expensive and require subsidies, as even the wealthiest can not afford to fully fund innovative solutions. Necessary It is therefore the involvement of institutions, who are professionally involved in specific lobbying activities. Who has not encountered the concept LOBBY energy?
Bearing in mind the developed part of our budget, we are fully entitled to evaluate the validity of the allocation of budgetary funds for the energy sector because, as suggested above, it has an impact on our lives daily. So what essentially promotes energy lobby:
Is this argument is correct? I think each of us as a payer of budgetary resources, may have to answer yourself. Furthermore, having as a State, the mighty potential of our POLISH boiler, you can spend a maximum of 10% of funds used by these ANTYLOBBY and the following years, POLISH adaptation and implementation of modernization to the extent that our homeland energy independence and also to make money on exports of electricity produced from Polish ingredients.
To maintain adopted a policy of not complaining for the next study will attempt to approximate the capacity of the taxpayer's serial development and savings in the energy sector.
Yours: Janusz
make daily payments of excise taxes, whether in grocery and industrial products, whether in direct accounts, electricity, fuel and many others. Someone has to pay to the economy is "revolved." It turns out that these fees are a huge part of our income. Going to the store, we pay for goods that we want to buy and often we have a lot of comments about the quality, price and same service in the store. Silent, however, and skip the most expensive case in our spending, limiting, for example, to complain about the prices resulting from the accounts as "current".
Instead, we hear or read about the big contribution of grants and projects in these topics from the energy sector. Think about who and what makes the financial support levels, and where does the money? You can write a powerful elaboraty answer is very simple: the above mentioned taxes! Donors, stating in a nutshell, they are various government organizations, concentrated in the municipalities, provinces or the central level. Come to the EU funds, which like the national measures BUDGET come from our country and the Member States. The budget is the result of our tax payments made to the Inland Revenue and not just the so-called. our annual tax returns, or returns an advance income tax. Purchasing the good in them pay taxes on goods and services producers. This happens throughout the EU, with which we are affiliated with you. So we have a simple answer, which allow us understand that sometimes you may want to know more, where does the money generated by us.
In every country, regardless of its wealth, the budget is always less than the needs posed to him in a given society. Expenditure on health, education, defense, environmental protection, human rights, social affairs, etc., are financed from the budget. For the distribution of insufficient resources, had been made in the most appropriate way, realizing the most important needs, the concept of lobbying. The rules of lobbying, or persuade the authorities to allocate budget amounts for specific purposes, have been normalized law of the country. Such institutions acting within the sector, are intended to persuade and thereby raise as much money.
The current in the previous considerations the energy sector, because of the question here, in addition to needs related to the ongoing technological progress, is also required for the implementation of "global warming". Investments of this type are very expensive and require subsidies, as even the wealthiest can not afford to fully fund innovative solutions. Necessary It is therefore the involvement of institutions, who are professionally involved in specific lobbying activities. Who has not encountered the concept LOBBY energy?
Bearing in mind the developed part of our budget, we are fully entitled to evaluate the validity of the allocation of budgetary funds for the energy sector because, as suggested above, it has an impact on our lives daily. So what essentially promotes energy lobby:
first construction of two nuclear power plants;may be mentioned a few solutions promoted but that's probably just a few generations of Poles, who will bear the consequences, both financial and ecological. Such an absolute rating may raise an objection, and great indignation. To justify it, however, let us examine some facts:
second underground storage of carbon dioxide;
third fired boilers with methane;
fourth wind farm;
5th incineration of biomass;
6th solar;
first in 1981, our southern neighbors began building one of the world's largest nuclear power plant at Temelin. Construction was completed in. .. 2002. Despite the recognition of her five years ago by the Austrian Institute for Applied Ecology to be one of the safest nuclear power plants in Europe, there has been many failures. Most recent trip in 2007, concerned the leak of radioactive water 1000 liters. We are dealing with huge spending the whole generations, while the risks and the time of decommissioning are notoriously ignored. Safe decommissioning of such facility to be profitable after the operation is estimated at approximately 45 years (two generations). It leaves out the ending uranium, the main source of energy;Comparing is a reflection of previous studies on developed by our team of proprietary technological solutions and implementation (Diversification They CCS, we CCP, etc.) come to the conclusion that we do not have to deal with the energy lobby, but from
second our country has been blessed by God the Creator innumerable goods often reaching thousands of meters under the ground. We have underground coal, copper, methane, oil, a source of thermal waters, and many other goods, which is impossible to list here. Even if you ignore the technical and economic efficiency of storing carbon dioxide underground, the massive financial postponed again for several generations of tax payers, we have to assume the need to withhold other underground works over a wide area of \u200b\u200bthe country. Suspension of underground work will be justified to the danger of releasing millions of tons of stored carbon dioxide;
third if you have already come to stop work underground, methane-fired boilers promoted, will rely on imports of raw materials. Our deposits can not be fully exploited!;
fourth apart again, technical and economic merits, let's look at how the "enemies" Don Quixote is the ecology. We have here undoubtedly a "clean renewable energy, however, what are our birds with particular reference to unique species of bats. Could it be "knights" environmentalists do not have anything to say? Productivity and profitability of this type of solutions has a lot to be desired;
fifth incineration of biomass, an interesting question! But no one takes into account the impact on the ecosystem of forest resources and overexploitation of agricultural land. Ignored the threat is also in the area charges for damaging carbon dioxide emissions of CO2. It is based on simple comparisons:so everyone can calculate the What is more CO2 emissions. Companies invest in biomass boilers to comply with the requirements laws that impose the appropriate permissions issue, who exceed this will pay a high price. Be inferred that in future the building will be the proverbial "nail in the coffin" of those investors. It leaves out the harmful emissions of greenhouse gases from the combustion of cellulose-containing microparticles of organisms that affect the lungs similar to asbestos;
- burning coal, emit about 800 CO2 units;
- burning biomass from trees, about 1,200 units emit CO2
sixth a "battery" solar is not even worth writing, because of their suitability for the energy sector is marginal ;
ANTYLOBBY ENERGY
Is this argument is correct? I think each of us as a payer of budgetary resources, may have to answer yourself. Furthermore, having as a State, the mighty potential of our POLISH boiler, you can spend a maximum of 10% of funds used by these ANTYLOBBY and the following years, POLISH adaptation and implementation of modernization to the extent that our homeland energy independence and also to make money on exports of electricity produced from Polish ingredients.
To maintain adopted a policy of not complaining for the next study will attempt to approximate the capacity of the taxpayer's serial development and savings in the energy sector.
Yours: Janusz
0 comments:
Post a Comment